Search Decisions

Decision Text

NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3705 14
Original file (NR3705 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied
sais — a

ee 2970, A pee my
Baw Tage DEPARTMENT OF THE NAVY
Hee: ae WE. BUARL) PUK CORREU HUN Ur NAVAL RECORDS
; 707 S. COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1004
ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490

 
    
   
  
  
   
    
   
   
   
  
  
   
    
  
  
     
  
  
  
  
   
   
  

  

DIC
Docket No. NR3705-14

19 Nov 14

our application for correction of your naval

This is in reference to y
ovigions of 10 USC 1552.

record pursuant to the pr

Board for Correction of Naval Records,
considered your application on

18 November 2014. Your allegations of error and injustice were
reviewed in accordance with administrative regulations and procedures
applicable to the proceedings of this Board. Documentary material
considered by the Board consisted cf your application, together with
all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and
applicable statutes, regulations and policies. in addition, the Board
considered the advisory opinion Furnished by HOMC memo 1070 MIO dated

10 July 2014, a copy of which is attached.

AB three-member panel of che
sitting in executive session,

entious consideration of the entire record,

dence submitted was insufficient to.
ble material error or injustice. In

this connection, the Board substantially concurred with the comments
contained in the advisory opinion. Accordingly, your application has
been denied. The names and votes of the members of the panel will be

furnished upon request.

after careful and conscli
the Board found that the evi
establish the existence of proba

It is regretted that the circumstances of your case are such that
favorabie action cannot be taken. You are entitled to have the Board

reconsider its decision upon submission of new evidence within one.
year from the date of the Board's decision. New evidence is evidence

not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in
this case. In this regard, it is important to keep in mind that 4

presumption of regularity attaches to all official records.
Docket No. NR3705-14

a correctiun ol ai ottictah meves
& to demonstrate the exis

7

tence of

See tee

Consequently, when applying Lor
record, the burden is on the applican
probable material error or injustice.

 

Tet 2 ae iw rw wr —
# a, . - 4 Sout +7 O'NETLL
¥ vale Executive Director
Enclosure: HQMC memo 1070 MIQ ata 19 Jul 14

* . a

Similar Decisions

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3337 14

    Original file (NR3337 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE RD SUITE 1004 ARLINGTON VA 22204-2490 BAN Docket No.NRO3337-14 10 October 2014 This is in reference to your application for correction to your naval record pursuant to the provisions of 10 United States Code, section L552 A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 7 October 2014. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3418 14

    Original file (NR3418 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    COURTHOUSE ROAD, SUITE 1007 oe, ae ARLINGTON, VA 22204-2490 JET Docket No. Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board ‘prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR7727 13

    Original file (NR7727 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/14U1330 dated 10 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR7727-13 consequentiy, wher appiyang [or @ correction Of am iliviai ives record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2013 | NR7727 13

    Original file (NR7727 13.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by OCNO memo 7220 Ser N130C/14U1330 dated 10 October 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR7727-13 consequentiy, wher appiyang [or @ correction Of am iliviai ives record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR3450 14

    Original file (NR3450 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by HOMC memo 5420 MMEA dated 4 August 2014, a copy of which is attached. NR3450-14 ay 4 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to iemanieaee the existence...

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR9659 14

    Original file (NR9659 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    A three-member panel of the Board for Correction of Naval Records, sitting in executive session, considered your application on 8 October 2014. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by CNP memo 5420 Ser N130C1/14U1140 dated 27 August 2014, a Copy of which is attached. NES for a correction of an otficial Consegquentiy, when applying naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5281 14

    Original file (NR5281 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo dated 17 June 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR4499 14

    Original file (NR4499 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval ord and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in your case. NR4499-14 Consequently, when applying for a correction of an official naval record, the burden is on the applicant to demonstrate the existence of probable material error or injustice.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR2696 14

    Original file (NR2696 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered the advisory opinion furnished by NPC memo 31 July 2014, a copy of which is attached. New evidence is evidence not previously considered by the Board prior to making its decision in this case.

  • NAVY | BCNR | CY2014 | NR5107 14

    Original file (NR5107 14.pdf) Auto-classification: Denied

    Documentary material considered by the Board consisted of your application, together with all material submitted in support thereof, your naval record and applicable statutes, regulations and policies. In addition, the Board considered your response to the advisory opinion dated 7 Nov 2014, However, after careful and conscientious consideration of the entire record, the Board found that the evidence submitted was insufficient to establish the existence of probable material error or...